Skip to main content
METHODOLOGYBEGINNER10 min read

Aircraft_Comparison_Methodology

How we source, validate, and present aircraft specifications with manufacturer-verified accuracy

> Executive Summary

Jet Comparison Hub prioritizes manufacturer specifications as the authoritative source for all aircraft data. When discrepancies arise between database sources and manufacturer specifications, we always defer to the manufacturer. This methodology ensures buyers make decisions based on official, verified performance data.

[1] Data Source Hierarchy

šŸ„‡

Primary Source: Manufacturer Official Specifications

Official manufacturer websites and specification sheets are our primary and authoritative source. Examples:

  • >Embraer.com/executive-jets
  • >Bombardier.com/aircraft
  • >Gulfstream.com/aircraft
  • >DassaultFalcon.com

āœ“ All aircraft names in comparisons link directly to manufacturer specification pages

🄈

Secondary Source: Industry Aviation Databases

We aggregate data from leading aviation industry databases via API integration:

  • •Performance specs: Range, speed, altitude, passenger capacity
  • •Market data: Inventory counts, pricing, time on market
  • •Operating costs: Fuel, maintenance, crew

⚠ When database values conflict with manufacturer specs, we update our data to match manufacturer values

šŸ„‰

Tertiary Sources: Industry Publications

Aviation publications used for historical context and market analysis only. Never used as primary spec source.

[2] Data Validation Process

Step 1: Initial Data Collection

We populate our database via industry API integrations, fetching:

await fetchPerformanceSpecs(modelId, {
  fields: [
    'cruis_speed',
    'max_range_miles',
    'ceiling_feet',
    'number_of_passengers',
    'baggage_volume'
  ]
})

Step 2: Cross-Reference with Manufacturer

Every specification is cross-referenced against official manufacturer data. Example audit findings:

Phenom 300E Discrepancy:

Database: 385 kts cruise → Manufacturer: 464 kts (high-speed cruise)

Praetor 600 Range:

Database: 4,040 nm → Manufacturer: 4,018 nm (with 4 passengers)

Step 3: Database Corrections

When discrepancies are found, we immediately update our database:

āœ“ Updated Phenom 300E cruise speed: 385 → 464 kts
āœ“ Updated Phenom 300E range: 2,033 → 2,010 nm
āœ“ Updated Praetor 600 range: 4,040 → 4,018 nm
āœ“ Updated Challenger 3500 speed: 442 → 470 kts
āœ“ Updated Challenger 3500 passengers: 9 → 10

Step 4: Ongoing Monitoring

We maintain a periodic audit schedule to catch manufacturer specification updates, typically when:

  • New aircraft variants are released
  • Performance improvements are certified
  • Engine upgrades are introduced

[3] Understanding Specification Variability

āš ļø Why do specifications vary?

Aircraft performance is not absolute. The same model can show different specifications based on configuration, load, and conditions. Understanding these variables is crucial for informed comparison.

āš™ļø Range Variations

  • •Passenger load: "4 pax @ 200 lb each"
  • •Fuel reserves: NBAA IFR vs actual
  • •Baggage: Full tanks vs full bags

⚔ Speed Variations

  • •Typical cruise: Most economical
  • •High-speed cruise: Maximum speed
  • •Max cruise: Structural limit

šŸ‘„ Passenger Capacity

  • •"Up to" max: Certified maximum
  • •Typical config: Standard layout
  • •Custom layouts: Owner preference

šŸ”ļø Altitude & Conditions

  • •ISA conditions: Standard day
  • •Temperature: Hot & high impact
  • •Wind: Headwind vs tailwind

Our Standard: We display manufacturer-specified performance under their stated conditions (e.g., "2,010 nm with 5 occupants, NBAA IFR reserves") and link to full specification sheets for detailed mission planning.

[4] Transparency & Attribution

Direct Links to Manufacturer Pages

Every aircraft name in our comparison tool links directly to the manufacturer's official specification page. This allows users to:

  • Verify specifications independently
  • Access detailed performance charts
  • Download official specification sheets
  • View configuration options and variants

Data Source Disclaimers

Our comparison panel displays a prominent disclaimer:

⚠ Data Source Notice

Performance data sourced from industry databases and aviation data providers. For official specifications, please visit the manufacturer's website via the aircraft name links. Manufacturer specifications are the authoritative source.

Audit Trail

We maintain documentation of all specification audits and corrections:

  • DATA-ACCURACY-AUDIT.md: Full audit findings and corrections
  • Git commit history: Timestamp and rationale for each update
  • Manufacturer source URLs: Documented for each correction

[5] Continuous Improvement

Report Inaccuracies

Found a specification that doesn't match the manufacturer's official data? We want to know.

>Email: data@jetcomparisonhub.com

Include: Aircraft model, specification in question, link to manufacturer source

āœ“ Our Commitment

Jet Comparison Hub exists to provide accurate, manufacturer-verified aircraft specifications for informed acquisition decisions. We will always:

  • āœ“Prioritize manufacturer specifications as the authoritative source
  • āœ“Immediately correct discrepancies when found
  • āœ“Provide direct links to manufacturer specification pages
  • āœ“Maintain transparency about data sources and methodology
  • āœ“Document all audits and corrections with full attribution

[ Related Resources ]